Get the latest insights, product updates, news and more directly to your inbox.
By providing my contact information, I authorize Boomi to provide occasional updates about products and solutions. I understand I can opt-out at any time and that my data will be handled according to Boomi's privacy policy.
byMark Emmons
Published
As concerns about an economic downturn mount, it’s prudent for companies to reassess their plans and budgets. One aspect is how organizations think about their technology initiatives. Given the current climate, is it necessary to consider course corrections? Should any long-term initiatives change? There’s a lot to consider.
Between the months of April and May, the stock market fell for eight consecutive weeks, its longest streak since May of 1923. The S&P briefly dipped below 20% (which typically signals a bear market), and according to the International Business Times, 57% of surveyed CEOs now believe that we’re due for a recession.
We thought this was a good moment to sit down with Barry Gerdsen, Boomi’s CTO of ISV/OEM Partnerships, to talk about how changes in economic conditions could impact multi-year IT commitments and projects.
There are a lot of reasons to suggest that’s where we’re headed. Foremost among them is inflation. According to the most recent reading of the Consumer Price Index, inflation stands at 8.3%, and the Producer Price Index is clocking in at 11%. With the Russian/Ukraine conflict, the ongoing supply chain issues, rising interest rates, and a hawkish Fed committed to fighting inflation, the risks to growth are real. Any one of these things could have prompted slowdown fears, and here we’re faced with all of them at once.
It’s already begun to happen in certain parts of the market. Several big tech companies have recently announced hiring freezes or layoffs, and previously red hot sectors like social media and crypto have reported poor quarterly earnings.
The tech unemployment rate currently stands at a low 1.7 percent. Wages for technologists are high, and there is intense demand for experienced and productive IT professionals. For this reason, if a recession were to materialize, most profitable companies would first employ hiring freezes rather than lay off IT personnel en masse. For yet-to-be profitable startups, however, the cuts will be deeper.
I can suggest several ways. First, understand how downturns have played out in the past. Second, consider and manage the future uncertainty they create. And third, take advantage of the technology that is available right now to help manage risks.
To my first point, not all downturns are the same. Historically speaking, the average length of time that recessions have lasted following the confirmation of a bear market is 285 days. In 2020, the downturn was severe but short-lived, thanks to tremendous levels of policy intervention. Conversely, the unwinding of the dot-com bubble starting in 2000 took almost two years (637 days).
In this case, the slowdown will last however long the Fed needs it to last in order to tame inflation. The Fed will continue to hike rates and quantitatively tighten until business conditions result in price stabilization.
In the past, this type of slowdown has caused disruption in several ways:
Most people immediately think “layoffs”, but the reality is that in a downturn, employees are just as likely to leave a company of their own volition. Some won’t tolerate changing objectives and conditions. Others won’t like the inevitable “do-more-with-less” edicts, and still others may question their motivations for working. For example, consider all the equity options issued by companies that find themselves out of the money in a falling stock market. Remove that incentive, and other employment opportunities begin to look more attractive. For this reason and others, it’s not uncommon for an IT department to look different at the end of a down cycle than it does at the beginning of it.
Recognize your own limitations when greenlighting projections. No one has a crystal ball, so the most prudent strategy involves moving development efforts forward in a careful way that mitigates recessionary risks. To do so, you might consider:
Uncertain macroeconomic environments offer the greatest potential for project disruption – either from plans changing or people changing. You’ll thank yourself later for anything you can do to bring down your time to value and mitigate the risk of interruption. What’s more, doing so will give stakeholders the confidence that you can be counted on to deliver, even in the most challenging times.
Integration never stops being a priority. Businesses have come to realize that the proper integration of data is vital to future-proofing product and service offerings in a way that can achieve competitive differentiation. They also understand that aggregating data from various sources allows them to develop highly targeted strategic plans. There’s nothing an organization values more than the quality of the data it bases its decisions on.
The beauty of iPaaS is that it can accomplish quite a bit, including:
These are just a few examples, of course. The reality is that since iPaaS can underpin many different development efforts, it offers a far-reaching scope of potential uses.
A good iPaaS can turn long-term projects into much shorter-term ones, which you need in this environment. It does so by abstracting away the technical complexity of coding and allowing you to develop integrations using a centralized console for configuring connection details to your endpoints. Typically, iPaaS provides pre-built connectors, business rules, maps, and transformations that facilitate the development of applications and orchestrate integration flows. Standardizing on a virtual platform that is much faster for development, easier to maintain, and more flexible to modify can greatly simplify an organization’s infrastructure and exponentially increase its output.
A recent study of customers using the Boomi AtomSphere Platform, conducted by Forrester Consulting, found that “the 3-year ROI on an iPaaS platform exceeds 410% and offers an investment payback in as little as 6 months. During this period, integration development time accelerated by 65%, allowing companies to save time and money, reduce risk, and get more done.”
In short, iPaaS is a worthy investment, especially considering the flexibility, efficiency, and risk mitigation advantages it offers an organization during these uncertain times.
Integration doesn’t have to be difficult. To learn more about the benefits and challenges of hand-coding vs. iPaaS, download our eBook, “The Developer’s Guide to Integration Approaches.”
On this page
Get the latest insights, news, and product updates directly to your inbox.
Subscribe now